| Such a paper can take a stance On one side, while | | | | The writer should make his or her position known in |
| briefly stating the opposing view. It can also discuss | | | | the first paragraph, if taking a stanceon one position |
| both sides In a straightforward manner, without | | | | or another. Otherwise, general discussion from |
| taking a stance on a particular view. If the writer | | | | varying points of viewshould be highlighted in the |
| decides to take one position or another on this type | | | | introduction. It is acceptable to use statistics and |
| of issue, plenty of research should Be obtained to | | | | commentsfrom survey participants, as long as the |
| back up the position or claim. Great resources for this | | | | information was obtained via some type of scientific |
| type of paper can come from medical journals, | | | | statistical method, with published results in a |
| psychology journals, health care professionals, | | | | professional journal. The statistics or information from |
| research studies, law journals, case law and many | | | | studies should corroborate your stance or that of the |
| other academic sources. Whatever position or stance | | | | viewspresented in the introduction. Data or |
| a writer takes on this issue, there is plenty of | | | | comments provided in research studies should |
| resource material available to help. | | | | beadequately referenced within the body of the |
| Sources for such a position or argumentative paper | | | | paper as well as in the works cited or reference |
| should be scholarly. They should bewritten by those | | | | page. |
| who are considered experts in their field, without | | | | Abortion essays can be difficult to write as there is |
| controversial scientificmethod or theory. The writer | | | | so much controversial informationavailable on the |
| should first outline the main points for argument, then | | | | topic. It can be made easier if the writer chooses a |
| develop each point with a statement and research | | | | basis for his or herposition on the topic. Whether |
| information that will be used to back upeach point. It | | | | from a legal, moral or other standpoint, the basis |
| is always good for a writer to briefly discuss or | | | | forthe argument should remain consistent throughout |
| outline the opposing view, no matter what position is | | | | the paper. For those who find such a paper difficult |
| taken. This allows the writer to better form his or | | | | to organize or compose, Academia Research offers |
| her argument and to pull the most applicable | | | | assistance in all stages of the process. Academic |
| information from sources. Points of discussion or | | | | research, writing and editing are some of the |
| argument in the paper should first be summarized in | | | | services offered,using academic writers who are |
| an introductory paragraph. Subsequent paragraphs | | | | experience in the particular subject matter of |
| should discuss each point in detail, while including | | | | Interest. Orders include a discussion board for |
| information ordata from sources. Discussion should | | | | customers and writers to communicate information |
| flow from one paragraph to the next with a | | | | about the paper. |
| sentence that links the points in some manner. | | | | |