Putting Principles Of Dave Pelz

In his book "Putt Like the Pros", the well known andinventor, and author. His scientific approach to putting
highly respected short game guru and teacher, Daveissues is clear when you read his books. While still at
Pelz, makes some interesting points that every golferNASA Pelz invented a putting aid called the Teacher
should be aware of. This article will discuss a numberPutter, which is a device that helps golfers groove
of these observations which will hopefully put thetheir strokes, giving feedback about whether the
science of putting into better perspective.stroke was good or poor.
As a young college student Pelz had aspirations ofEarly on Pelz wanted to understand how many putts
being a great tour player, and he played college golfa person could reasonably expect to make. To
at Indiana University in the Big 10. As time went byaddress this he build a machine called the Perfect
he became more and more frustrated that he couldRoller, which took some time to perfect, but he could
not beat a certain player from Ohio State, also in theeventually roll perfect putts from the machine, time
Big 10, named Jack Nicklaus. Of course no one knewafter time. He took his machine to several golf
at that time that Nicklaus would become perhaps thecourses and took data about the number of putts his
greatest player to ever play the game. Before hismachine could hole. He tried 100 putts on each of the
last year in school Pelz and his coach decided that18 holes of the courses he did his tests on, rolling 12
putting was the aspect of the game that was holdingfoot putts in each case. To his surprise his machine
him back, so with great determination he decided tocould only make about 50% of the putts attempted
dedicate himself to practicing his putting and makingon two different golf courses. He improved this by
improvements. He arranged his class schedule sucharranging to do his experiments on a course with a
that in the fall and winter season when the weatherreputation for excellent greens, and he did this early
did not allow golf to be played he took a very heavyin the morning just after the greens had been
load of classes. In the spring season he then had amowed and no players preceded him on the greens.
light class load and was finished every day by 10:30Here he was about to hole 84% of the putts, a big
am. He thus was at the golf course by 11am eachimprovement, but his machine still missed 16% of the
day. Pelz was obviously dedicated and motivatedattempts in almost perfect conditions.
since he practiced putting 4 hours every day!Pelz then did experiments with golf balls and
At the end of the college golf season that year Pelzdetermined that golf ball imperfections can made
realized that his stroke average was 0.1 strokessignificant differences, and he also studied the effect
higher than the previous year. In other words after allof the imperfections golfers cause on putting greens
that practice and dedication, instead of improving, hiswhen walking on them. The bottom line is that even
scores got worse! In fact Pelz mentions that he hasprofessionals can't expect to make them all. He
often seen young players of twelve to fourteenpresents data which shows that PGA Tour players in
years of age who are fabulous putters, but by thetournament play made on average between 9% and
time they are older they are only mediocre. This21% of the 15 foot putts they attempted. For 10
underlines an important point that Pelz learned later infoot putts the numbers increase from about 16% up
life about putting: if you are going to practice youto 31 %. Even on 6 foot putts these pros, the best
need to practice intelligently. This means you need toplayers in the world, made on average from about
get accurate feedback about your stroke, and this in45% to 56% of the putts they attempted. So if you
turn means you need to know more than whetherthink you should hole every six footer you face, your
the ball went into the cup or not. The problem here isexpectations are too high. One way to improve that
that it is very difficult to see the difference betweenperformance is to read Pelz' book, "Putt Like the
whether a golfer made a good putting stroke or aPros", and absorb what he says. His teaching method
poor one.includes making a correct stroke, having the correct
Pelz decided upon graduating from college that heface angle at impact, hitting the ball on the putter
could not compete and succeed on the PGA tour. He"sweet spot", having good touch and distance
studied physics, mathematics and related courses,control, and improving the mental aspects of putting.
and he took a job at NASA and became a scientist.If a golfer addresses these tasks in the proper way,
He stayed there for 15 years before taking the divethat is obtaining proper feedback, he almost certainly
into the golf business as a short game consultant,will improve his putting.