Yes, Madam President

I know that this is the time for an American WomanAnd "nothing" in this context means, "everyone is in
to become President of the United States ofthis for money". This would mean your present
America.Irregardless of the "right or wrong" of that.in-office politician!What woman has all this? None!Then
No matter your concern about a woman leading thewhy worry about a woman jumping on the
Nation. And most especially, ignoring those for whombandwagon out of the sidelines, or wings of a stage?
have knowledge that having such a female leader is aBecause this country is ready for one. Not only
curse, not a blessing!And, if you can, put aside anyready, but wanting one! I can explain this "readiness"
animosity for this authors' views just expressed.in this way.The Republicons are failing in the polls.
Either side of the issue. I have no "side" of thisThey have to try to pay to make a poll come out,
"issue" as a matter of fact. That is because I know, Ias opposed to paying to make a poll (come out). You
say; I know, that this country is coming to aknow, or should, that any poll you and I hear about,
dramatic end! Does that shock you? It shouldn't.Nowwill be written, structured, and paid for by those
that we have the "preparers" about of the way, weinterested in the outcome. But only interested in the
can venture into the real issue of "womenoutcome. Not interested in any manner of a poll that
Presidents", and leave the already present "womenshows the opposite of what is wanted! So if "they"
leadership" aside for the moment.If we were to havefund it, then they "own" it. And if it happened to say,
a woman elected for President, and I think we will"negative" or "positive", when the opposite is
have at least a woman Vice-President, who wouldwanted, then as "owners" they chunk it. It is
she be? Give that some thought if you have not"copyrighted". Contracts signed up front can and do
already done so in the near past.If we havetake care of those instances. Those instances will not
someone, other than Mrs. Clinton, and Ms. Rice (Ihappen by "Pollsters", because they are in this for
don't know if she is married?). We can leave thosethe money! And who can make money from people
two national known women for later. Right at thetelling the truth, whenever those that want polls
moment, we are speaking to the point of who thedone want "their truth". They don't lie, but may as
President would be if it were a woman. Which wouldwell. The question is like the one that a lawyer uses
leave out of the grouping, the two ladiesin court if he can get away with it. If you answers
mentioned.Is there a "known" entity ready at the"Yes', you are in trouble, and if you answer 'No", you
stage wings who can "pounce' upon the comingare in the same boat. "Please just answer "yes" or
opportunity? If there is, she needs to be well funded."no", like his honor told you too! Did you like having
So what would be the normal assets needed by anysex with me last night?" See? That is too easy to
man (and now presumably woman,) would needperform. Polling is like magic. And like Magic, it can be
whenever considering running? Can they be listed bymore than slight of hand.Well, we have reached the
citizens at large? Not an expert listing, but aend of our thinking about the subject. And this is
thumbsketch of the qualifications that would lead awhat I can see. I get them "vibrations" from time to
person to the Presidency.One mentioned is funding.time ya know? If a "serious" Female Presidential
He, or she, would have to have tons of money.Candidate ( serious means here having all the above
Millions. And be able to come into the contest withmentioned assets) she would come from California. If
the ability to generate millions more. Millions meansany Female Presidential Candidate makes her way to
that the candidate would be connected and knowna "win" in the coming election, I think she will have to
by a large percentage of those controlling or havingdecide to try for a contest, or give over to running
money. Billionaires are important here. Would you turnon a proffered VP seat. Vice-President Office is
down some Billionaire just because he starts warsoffered to any powerful, or prominent "runner-up" in
after "investing in a Countries currency, to watch itthe parade leading up to the real election day. In the
move one way or the other, as he deems fit? Well,end of the parade the "second place" is not always
too late! You might not take his millions, but your/ourchosen. But the person with the "runner-up", meaning
representatives already do! Unabashedly!And fundingin money first, and power within the Politburo of this
would mean money from other nations leaders. Ifnation, is weighed. If she maintains those assets, then
you would turn down money from Israel, or Syria, orshe will be given, or proffered, the VP position. This
Saudi Arabia, then you can never be a Presidentialwould be for gaining the women vote. However if
Candidate, let alone any other national office. Butshe has a Miss-step, as some candidates have in the
others in office nationally, and at the state level do!past while in front of the people, she will get the
Unabashedly.The Russians cannot "chip in', and the"door-prize".Anyone getting the "proffer" would be
countries of Great Britain; Spain; France; do not havefrom Texas. I can think only of one possible person,
to! They already control though, not only money, butwoman, that would fit that bill. She would be a
in other ways. The Vatican, I suspect is in the "give a"heavy hitter" in the "powerful" connections, as well
few millions" category! Unabashedly. But inthe experience category. But how about her money
secret.Knowledge is the second factor. You mightquotient? I have no way to know how large it has
overcome experience, if you have a great "second",gotten in scope, but she obviously had enough
like Bush has Chaney. And you might not worry"graftuity" to make it to Congress!Now, what about
about volunteers. Because that groundswell can bean African-American? Or an Mexican-American. Nope!
generated or forced by those you may hire. Only theFor complex reasons, there is not going to be a
sane (known or unknown) and or persons that aresuccessful bid by an African-American for Presidential
unknown nationally fail to generate a following. All ofoffice. But there will be one in the next generation!
your representatives in office now had to hireThe Good Lord willing, this nation will have another
experts at all levels and generate volunteers, led bygeneration to have such a won. The
paid "volunteers", to get into office. Unabashedly.TheMexican-Americans are in trouble, not only locally,
third I hold in importance is the ladies background. Ifstatewide, but Nationally as well. The antics that was
you think a dirty background is hard on any man thatfostered on the "Activists" by those that knew how
might be elected, then you can hardly imagine what ait was going to be later on, finished the chances of
woman might have to go through. Any backgroundany Mexican-American Political Candidacy for the near
would have to be more than just clean. A man, likefuture. For our discussion, I mean Mexican-American,
Bush, could drink to much at times, or Clinton, cannot mixed blood. We have tons of mixed blood
whore at times, and that is just being "one of thepolitical persons in office.All that needs to be done
boys". In fact, whether or not you believe it, womennow, is to forecast a single woman from California to
will not vote for a man that is too clean! It would bebe President! Single here does not mean "not
easier for a serial killer to get elected than a "Billymarried". Nor would any "married=married" qualify. Not
Grayham" type! And that is a shame. Not because Iyet, than that same Lord. Not from Northern
would like to see a "minister" type leader, but that ICalifornia. Not from L.A. That is about as far as I can
think "clean" is not a bad thing for Americansee.Later,
Presidents. But what Politician could toe that line?Dan BunchDan Bunch, a Cherokee; Choctaw; and
None! And that is a shame. Because I also know thatMelungeon; whose mother was a naturalized citizen
most Preachers couldn't even pretend to toe thatborn in Hong Kong. His father was born in Texas, a
line! Unabashedly."Respect" from other politicians. I putCherokee-Choctaw-Melungeon, who served in the
that "respect" into quotation marks because I do notArmy during WWII.Dan Bunch grew up in Texas,
mean respect. I mean "respect" the way thatwhere he participated in; football, baseball, and boxing.
politicians know and understand and respect. If aHe enlisted in the United States Navy Reserve while
person is known, then they have assets as well asstill a junior in high school. He has had a multitude of
detractors in the line-up of in-office politicians. Theexperience in the business world in; insurance, real
way I would list the persons by occupation, thatestate, finance, and a builder of custom homes. He
could affect a persons chance to gain office, is;has always been a writer, and cartoonist. He
Leadership in the Party. Too bad, that. And nextattributes his interest in many subjects to his early
Leadership in office within the whole of Congress. Butcareer as a newspaper boy. He married his high
above all, leadership in parties that are not elected!school sweetheart Gayle, with whom they have two
Those who swing a big "bat", that can generatechildren and five grandchildren.Dan Bunch is a graduate
funds from the Party membership are right up thereof Grayson Co Jr. College, which he attended upon
at first on the list if not tied with the first mentioned.his return from Vietnam. He was a PO2'nd,
Without the "grease" applied to places that "meetcrewmember aboard U.S.
the road" then nothing can be done for a candidate.