CAMPUS

 

Anti-Abortion Demonstration Causes Frustration on Campus
On March 11, A.S. Student Trustee, Carl Poole, received a restive call from Evergreen asking whether San José City College was having a riot on campus. Although it turned out to be nowhere near a riot, a demonstration by a small anti-abortion group caused a lot of frustration among students and faculty. more...

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anti-Abortion Demonstration Causes Frustration on Campus
Ivan Nikittin
Managing Editor
Cody Kraatz
Assistant Editor

On March 11, A.S. Student Trustee, Carl Poole, received a restive call from Evergreen asking whether San José City College was having a riot on campus. Although it turned out to be nowhere near a riot, a demonstration by a small anti-abortion group caused a lot of frustration among students and faculty.
The group arrived in front of the Admissions and Records building around 10 a.m. with signs and placards advocating a stop to abortion practices. Some pictures that showed parts of a fetus’ head being held by a pair of tongs caused a wide range of emotions from frustration to anger among SJCC students. Some students were seen crying.

Standing before these graphic pictures, Jason Storms, a demonstrator from the faith-based group asserted, “This is a human being;  (it) should have the same rights of any other human being.”  The group, known as Survivors, protests against what they call “the abortion holocaust.” According to their website, they target High School and College students.
Poole and A.S. President Joseph Macedo called the event “very upsetting.” Macedo felt that because campus was not notified prior to the demonstration, nobody had enough time to make sure that both sides of the issue were represented. The group arrived at SJCC without any warning or consent from campus authorities.

“The goal was to cause a disturbance, not to inform,” says Macedo. He says that the issue is very important, but both sides had to have equal opportunities. “Campus should support both sides,” adds Linda Rea, SJCC student.
The event attracted a crowd of about 60 people. Some of them were watching in silence, others engaged in debates. One SJCC student, on condition of anonymity, said that he was unconvinced by the pictures, saying that they were “kinda nasty.”

Soon a group of unaffiliated SJCC students organized an impromptu counter-demonstration on the other side of the square supporting the pro-choice argument with hand-made signs. Mutual accusations and arguing erupted between the two groups and lasted until the pro-life activists left campus at 12:30 p.m.

Dr. Chui Tsang, SJCC President, said that he was on a meeting away from campus when he heard about the event, and he had to come back to take a look. “Apparently, this group came uninvited and did not have a proper clearance ahead of time,” he said. He also said that the group tired to provoke college personnel to arrest them and to cause a public stir.

Nonetheless, the organizers were granted authorization to continue the demonstration. “As long as they are not disrupting (college) activities … we will allow them the display,” says Tsang. He added that campus authorities and the police had to make sure there was no violence.

The authorization came from Phil Renteria, Director of Campus Life.  He explained, “Any group can come on campus as long as they fill out the proper paperwork.”  They did in fact fill out this paperwork the morning of the demonstration.  Renteria says that one form authorizes a certain space to be used for a certain amount of time, in this case from 10:30 until 2:00 p.m.  The demonstrators left almost an hour and a half earlier.

In response to the graphic nature of the demonstration, Renteria suggests, “We should have some dialogue about that.  Is it within the law?” Campus policy does not prohibit public displays in demonstration scenarios, but the students were generally offended.

Poole says that the protesters had “no consideration to the feelings of people.” He added, “(They were) pushing their First Amendment rights on top of other student’s rights.”

“We allow freedom of expression,” said Tsang. He mentioned that there is a history of demonstrations on college campuses, so it is not an extraordinary event. He emphasized, “We want to continue that.”
Caption:Campus police officers stand by to ensure the situation doesn’t get out of control as San José City College students look at the anti-aboriton posters with disproof. Photo by Eddie Rocha.

   
   
   Copyright © 2003 San José City College Times    Contact us